»Ĭlearly, we can die using Wikipedia that’s great ! – « The overwhelming majority of such articles are written, in part or in whole, by non-professionals. – « however, no warranty whatsoever is made that any of the articles are accurate. – « Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here » – « Wikipedia makes no guarantee of validity » It’s a factory for Trolls, communication companies and secret services ! The reliability of the thing, we can have doubts ! That was Tom’s lyricism on an early sunny and beautiful Sunday evening :=)Īnd if you started by reading the warnings on Wikipedia ! Then, maybe, do we get closer to truth, at the horizon. Is there any ultimate destination by the way? I’d rather say “not the only destination” and emphasize on the requirement for as many sources as we can get, read, discuss, contradict. So I’ll agree with you : “Wikipedia may be sometimes a good place to start, but not the ultimate destination.”. I guess the point is to never follow the band, yet neither to discriminate it. At the end it’s always an individual’s honesty that leads or controls the band. Democracy allows the best for anyone and the worst for everyone : that’s life.
#Who wrote the information on netfits site free
Wikimedia and its most famous project, Wikipedia, are invaluable but truth is never in the hands of one alone (hence the Wikipedia Free concept: free to consult & free to edit), nor in the hands of a multitude : neither autocracy nor democracy hold an hypothetical universal truth, an honest autocrat can enlighten truth and a dishonest multitude hide it (and vice-versa). This lack of mine remains nevertheless somewhat compensated by the fact I never believe or suspect whatever information : in this regard notorious fakes are by themselves information… on falsification. I believe it is most valuable for article editors and/or for information investigators so to say. WhoWrote, the concept, isn’t fit for my capacities given I wouldn’t really know what to do with the provided information. I prefer scripts to extensions when they perform as well. I just had a look at it (install aborted) and it doesn’t include the mobile pages : How is this done? Thanks glad the script works nice for you. The article states as well that “The information is already available on Wikipedia, but it is not well presented and it takes time to go through it.”. The sidebar is not available on Wikimedia mobile pages, unfortunately. Regarding this apparently most valuable ‘Who Wrote That?’ extension, the article states that it is accessible via the Wikipedia’s article sidebar. Rather than using the REDIRECTOR Firefox extension to redirect Wikimedia to their mobile display I now use the ‘User-Agent Switcher’ extension and set the User-Agent for these sites to ‘iOS / Firefox’ which forces these pages to open in their mobile display.
I prefer their mobile pages because they display only the substantial content, and the rendering is extra-fast.
I do call upon Wikipedia articles quite extensively, Wikipedia mainly but also the other Wikimedia projects.
0 kommentar(er)
